Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Patriots Match Player Stats — In a game that swung violently from an early New England lead to a Rams aerial assault, the Los Angeles Rams emerged with a 28-22 victory over the New England Patriots on November 17, 2024.
Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Patriots Match Player Stats reveal a tale of two halves: the Patriots struck first, but Matthew Stafford and his receiving corps ripped the game open with four touchdown passes before halftime.
The Rams (5-5) traveled to Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, and weathered an early 7-0 deficit to claim their fifth win of the season. Attendance reached 64,628 as the home crowd watched.
Drake Maye and the Patriots (3-8) grab an early lead, only to see the Rams rattle off 28 unanswered points across the second and third quarters. The final scoreline — 28-22 — flattered the Patriots, who mounted a late rally but fell short when Kam Kinchens intercepted Maye in the final minutes.
Match Overview Table
| Information | Match Details |
| Event | NFL Regular Season — Week 11 |
| Game | Los Angeles Rams vs New England Patriots |
| Date | November 17, 2024 |
| Venue | Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, MA |
| Attendance | 64,628 |
| Winner | Los Angeles Rams |
| Final Score | 28 — 22 |
| Broadcast | FOX, NFL Sunday Ticket |
Core Match Statistics Overview
Team Stats Table
| Metric | Los Angeles Rams | New England Patriots |
| Total Yards | 402 | 382 |
| Passing Yards | 295 | 257 |
| Rushing Yards | 107 | 125 |
| Comp/Att | 18/27 (66.7%) | 29/39 (74.4%) |
| Touchdowns (Pass/Rush) | 4 / 0 | 2 / 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | 3 | 0 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| 3rd Down Efficiency | 6/14 (42.9%) | 2/8 (25.0%) |
| Red Zone Efficiency | 3/4 (75.0%) | 2/5 (40.0%) |
| Time of Possession | 22:40 | 37:20 |
Data sourced from ESPN game statistics
Passing Efficiency
The Rams’ passing attack was ruthlessly efficient. Stafford completed 18 of 27 attempts for 295 yards, averaging a staggering 10.9 yards per attempt. The Patriots, by contrast, needed 39 attempts to generate just 257 net passing yards after accounting for sacks — a 6.1-yard average that paled in comparison.
- Stafford posted a near-perfect 142.7 passer rating with zero interceptions.
- Maye threw for 282 yards but was sacked three times and tossed a critical late interception.
Ball Movement and Field Position
New England dominated time of possession — 37:20 to 22:40 — yet turned that advantage into only 22 points. The Rams made every drive count, scoring touchdowns on four of their five possessions spanning the second and third quarters.
- Los Angeles converted 6 of 14 third downs compared to New England’s 2 of 8.
- The Patriots committed two turnovers (one fumble lost, one interception) while the Rams protected the football perfectly.
Defensive Disruption
The Rams’ defensive front generated consistent pressure without blitzing heavily. They recorded three sacks and six tackles for loss, forcing Maye into uncomfortable throws. New England’s defense, meanwhile, failed to register a single sack and managed only two passes defensed.
Period-by-Period Analysis
| Period | Los Angeles Rams | New England Patriots |
| 1st Quarter | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd Quarter | 14 | 3 |
| 3rd Quarter | 14 | 3 |
| 4th Quarter | 0 | 9 |
| Final | 28 | 22 |
Score progression sourced from ESPN box score
First Quarter — Patriots Strike First
New England capitalized on the opening possession, marching downfield to take a 7-0 lead. The Rams’ offense looked disjointed, managing minimal yardage as the home crowd roared. Drake Maye looked composed, spreading the ball efficiently to Hunter Henry and Kendrick Bourne.
Second Quarter — Rams Explode
Los Angeles flipped the script entirely. Stafford connected with Cooper Kupp for a five-yard touchdown to tie the game, then found Puka Nacua for a 12-yard score to take a 14-7 lead. The Patriots could only muster a field goal, cutting the deficit to 14-10 at halftime. The momentum had shifted decisively.
Third Quarter — Rams Pull Away
The Rams’ aerial assault continued unabated. Stafford hit Kupp again — this time on a 69-yard bomb that broke the game open. A 19-yard strike to Demarcus Robinson pushed the lead to 28-10.
New England managed only a field goal, entering the final quarter trailing 28-13. The Rams’ 28-point unanswered run effectively decided the contest.
Fourth Quarter — Patriots Rally Falls Short
New England showed fight, scoring nine points in the final period — a touchdown and a safety — to narrow the gap to 28-22. However, with under two minutes remaining, Kam Kinchens intercepted Maye, sealing the Rams’ victory. The Patriots’ comeback bid was admirable but too little, too late.
Detailed Team Player Statistics
Los Angeles Rams Player Statistics
Matthew Stafford — Quarterback
| Stat | Value |
| Completions/Attempts | 18/27 |
| Passing Yards | 295 |
| Touchdowns | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 142.7 |
| Sacks | 0 |
Stafford delivered one of his sharpest performances of the season, tying his season high with four touchdown passes and zero turnovers. His 10.9 yards per attempt reflected a willingness to push the ball downfield, and his 142.7 rating underscored his near-flawless execution.
Cooper Kupp — Wide Receiver
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Targets | 10 |
| Receiving Yards | 106 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long | 69 |
Kupp was unstoppable, hauling in six catches for 106 yards and two touchdowns — including a 69-yard score that effectively put the game out of reach. His chemistry with Stafford was on full display, as he consistently found soft spots in New England’s zone coverage.
Puka Nacua — Wide Receiver
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Targets | 9 |
| Receiving Yards | 123 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long | 37 |
Nacua continued his remarkable rookie campaign, leading the Rams in receptions and receiving yards. His 12-yard touchdown in the second quarter gave Los Angeles its first lead, and he consistently moved the chains on third down.
Kyren Williams — Running Back
| Stat | Value |
| Rushing Attempts | 15 |
| Rushing Yards | 86 |
| Yards per Carry | 5.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long | 18 |
Williams provided the ground-game balance the Rams needed, averaging an efficient 5.7 yards per carry. Though he didn’t find the end zone, his presence kept the Patriots’ defense honest and opened up play-action opportunities for Stafford.
New England Patriots Player Statistics
Drake Maye — Quarterback
| Stat | Value |
| Completions/Attempts | 29/39 |
| Passing Yards | 282 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 100.6 |
| Sacks | 3 |
Maye showed promise and poise, completing 74.4% of his passes for 282 yards and two touchdowns. However, the three sacks and the late interception — his only turnover — proved costly. His 100.6 rating was respectable, but the offense stalled in the red zone, converting just 2 of 5 trips into touchdowns.
Kendrick Bourne — Wide Receiver
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Targets | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 70 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long | 21 |
Bourne was Maye’s most reliable target, catching all five passes thrown his way for 70 yards and a touchdown. His 21-yard score in the fourth quarter gave the Patriots a glimmer of hope during their late rally.
Hunter Henry — Tight End
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Targets | 9 |
| Receiving Yards | 63 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long | 15 |
Henry served as Maye’s security blanket, leading the team in receptions with six grabs for 63 yards. He consistently found openings underneath, but the Patriots struggled to translate those completions into end-zone production.
Rhamondre Stevenson — Running Back
| Stat | Value |
| Rushing Attempts | 20 |
| Rushing Yards | 73 |
| Yards per Carry | 3.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long | 12 |
Stevenson carried the rushing load with 20 attempts for 73 yards. While his 3.7-yard average was modest, he provided a physical presence that kept the Rams’ defense honest. The Patriots’ inability to establish a consistent ground game, however, limited their offensive balance.
Statistical Leaders Summary Table
| Category | Los Angeles Rams | New England Patriots |
| Leading Scorer | Matthew Stafford (4 TDs) | Drake Maye (2 TDs) |
| Second Leading Scorer | Cooper Kupp (2 TDs) | Kendrick Bourne (1 TD) |
| Top Rebounder/Defense | Christian Rozeboom (11 tackles) | Ja’Whaun Bentley (9 tackles) |
| Most Assists/Playmaker | Matthew Stafford (295 pass yds) | Drake Maye (282 pass yds) |
Analytical Breakdowns
Why the Rams Won
Elite Quarterback Play
Stafford’s performance was the single biggest differentiator. His 142.7 passer rating and four touchdowns without an interception gave the Rams a massive advantage in the passing game. He was particularly lethal from a clean pocket, completing 14 of 18 passes for 267 yards and three touchdowns when untouched.
| Metric | Stafford | Maye |
| Passer Rating | 142.7 | 100.6 |
| TD/INT | 4/0 | 2/1 |
| Yards/Attempt | 10.9 | 7.1 |
Explosive Plays in the Passing Game
The Rams generated chunk plays at will. Kupp’s 69-yard touchdown, Nacua’s 37-yard reception, and Robinson’s 19-yard score all came on plays that flipped field position and momentum. New England’s defense, which failed to record a sack, had no answer for Los Angeles’ vertical attack.
Red Zone Efficiency
Los Angeles converted 3 of 4 red-zone opportunities into touchdowns. By contrast, the Patriots managed just 2 touchdowns in 5 red-zone trips, settling for field goals that kept them at arm’s length.
Defensive Takeaways
The Rams forced two turnovers — a fumble recovery and Kinchens’ game-sealing interception — while committing none of their own. That plus-two turnover margin was decisive in a game decided by six points.
Why the Patriots Lost
Heavy Dependence on the Passing Game
New England ran the ball 30 times for 125 yards, but their 4.2-yard average masked a lack of explosive rushing plays. With no rushing touchdowns and only one run longer than 16 yards, the Patriots became one-dimensional, allowing the Rams’ pass rush to pin their ears back.
Red Zone Stagnation
The Patriots’ 40% red-zone conversion rate was simply not good enough. Two field goals and a turnover on downs inside the 20-yard line left at least nine points off the board. In a six-point loss, those missed opportunities proved fatal.
Inability to Protect Maye
The Rams sacked Maye three times and hit him on multiple other occasions. New England’s offensive line struggled to contain Los Angeles’ defensive front, particularly on third down, where the Patriots converted just 25% of their attempts.
Historical Context & Advanced Insights
Season Series Breakdown
The Rams and Patriots have a limited but intriguing history. Prior to this matchup, the Patriots held a 9-7 series advantage over the Rams franchise dating back to 1974. This victory evened the regular-season record at 7-7, though the Patriots still hold a 2-0 edge in postseason meetings (Super Bowl XXXVI and LIII).
| Recent Matchups | Winner | Score |
| 2024 Week 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-22 |
| 2020 Week 14 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-3 |
| 2019 Super Bowl LIII | New England Patriots | 13-3 |
| 2016 Week 13 | New England Patriots | 26-10 |
Historical data sourced from Pro-Football-Reference
Advanced Statistical Insights
Assist-to-Field-Goal Ratio: The Rams’ passing attack produced 4 touchdowns on just 27 attempts — a touchdown rate of 14.8%. The Patriots, despite 39 attempts, managed only 2 touchdowns — a 5.1% rate.
This efficiency gap was the single most predictive metric of the final score.Yards per Point: Los Angeles generated 402 total yards for 28 points (14.4 yards per point), while New England needed 382 yards for just 22 points (17.4 yards per point). The Rams’ ability to turn yards into points more efficiently underscored their superior execution in the red zone.
Pressure Rate: The Rams recorded pressures on 34% of Maye’s dropbacks, per Next Gen Stats, while the Patriots failed to pressure Stafford on a single dropback. That disparity in pass protection directly influenced each quarterback’s performance.
Game Implications & Key Lessons
What This Means for the Rams
- Playoff pulse: At 5-5, the Rams kept their NFC playoff hopes alive with a critical road win against a conference opponent.
- Stafford’s resurgence: This performance demonstrated that Stafford remains capable of carrying the offense when given time and protection.
- Receiver depth: With Kupp, Nacua, and Robinson all contributing, the Rams boast one of the league’s most dangerous receiving corps.
What This Means for the Patriots
- Rookie lessons: Maye showed flashes of brilliance but also demonstrated the inconsistency expected of a rookie quarterback.
- Red zone woes: The Patriots must address their inability to finish drives — settling for field goals will not beat quality opponents.
- Defensive adjustments: Recording zero sacks and zero turnovers is a recipe for disaster; New England’s pass rush needs an urgent overhaul.
Key Lessons
- Quarterback efficiency trumps volume: Stafford’s 18 completions produced more points than Maye’s 29.
- Turnover margin is decisive: The Rams’ zero-turnover performance was the foundation of their victory.
- Red zone execution separates contenders from pretenders: 75% vs. 40% conversion rates tell the story.
- Explosive plays change games: The Rams’ 69-yard touchdown was a 14-point swing in itself.
- Pass protection wins championships: Zero sacks allowed vs. three sacks taken is a massive advantage.
- Momentum is real: The Rams’ 28-point unanswered run across the second and third quarters broke the Patriots’ will.
FAQ & Conclusion
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs New England Patriots game on November 17, 2024?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the New England Patriots 28-22 at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts.
What were Matthew Stafford’s stats in the Rams vs Patriots game?
Stafford completed 18 of 27 passes for 295 yards, 4 touchdowns, and 0 interceptions, posting a 142.7 passer rating.
How many yards did Cooper Kupp have against the Patriots?
Cooper Kupp recorded 6 receptions for 106 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns, including a 69-yard score.
What were Drake Maye’s stats vs the Rams?
Maye completed 29 of 39 passes for 282 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 1 interception, with a 100.6 passer rating.
How did the Rams’ defense perform against the Patriots?
The Rams’ defense recorded 3 sacks, forced 2 turnovers (1 fumble, 1 interception), and held the Patriots to 2-for-8 on third down.
What was the turning point of the game?
Cooper Kupp’s 69-yard touchdown reception from Stafford in the third quarter extended the Rams’ lead to 28-10 and proved to be the decisive blow.
Conclusion
The Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Patriots Match Player Stats paint a clear picture: efficiency and execution outperformed volume and possession.
Matthew Stafford’s four-touchdown, zero-interception masterclass — complemented by Cooper Kupp’s two scores and Puka Nacua’s 123 receiving yards — overwhelmed a Patriots team that controlled the clock but couldn’t finish drives. Drake Maye showed encouraging signs in defeat, but New England’s red-zone struggles, defensive passivity, and turnover issues proved insurmountable. In a league where quarterback play and turnover margin often decide outcomes, the Rams checked both boxes emphatically.
